Freyne Land

Interesting backfield took on the American Enterprise Institute on Tuesday. U.S. Senators Patrick Leahy, John Kerry, Diane Feinstein and Bernie Sanders.

Their target: Chris DeMuth (at left), president of the Exxon-Mobil-connected "think-tank." The four senators wrote Mr. DeMuth to express their  "very serious concerns about news reports" AEI offerted to pay scientists up to $10,000  if they’d publicly question the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Report released last week.

"We hope that you will respond to this letter by telling us that the news reports that you offered to pay scientists up to $10,000 are incorrect. If not we trust that AEI will publicly apologize for this conduct and demonstrate its sincerity by properly disciplining those responsible. We look forward to hearing from you on this most important matter."

"It's outrageous," said Sen. Sanders in a release, "that a right-wing think tank with ties to Big Oil and the Bush Administration is trying to twist scientific findings for their political purposes on the pressing issue of climate change. The IPCC report confirms the urgency of the problem and adds to the scientific consensus that global warming is happening now and is human-caused. Is there no limit to the lengths that some corporate-funded groups will go to protect their donors' short-term profits? Is the fate of the entire planet not important enough for them to put the common interest above their narrow self-interest?

"The truth is that this scandalous behavior on the part of AEI is just the latest example of how big money interests distort and undermine honest debate on the important issues facing our country in so many areas.”

Jeezum crow. Ol' Bernardo hasn’t changed his tune one note in the 26 years I’ve been covering him.

Ah, made it to another Super Bowl Sunday!

Lost count.

And we're starting to lose count of the kudos coming in for Chris Graff's Vermont political gem -  "Dateline Vermont."

The latest is from Roll Call.

Here are some exerpts from the review.

Scenes From

Vermont

January 30, 2007
By Marnette Federis,
Roll Call Staff

Ritchie Rich Tarrant, that is, the Republican software gazillionaire who ran for a Vermont U.S. Semate seat while building a new$9 million home on Florida's Atlantic coast. You'll recall Mr. Tarrantwas Independent Bernie Sanders' opponent in last November's Vermont U.S. Senate race.

Sanders simply crushed Tarrant, beating him by better than 2-to-1.

TheNational Journal reports this week that Ritchie Rich, who received84,924 votes or 32.3 percent compared to Ol'Bernardo's 171,638 votes or 65.4percent, spent more money per vote than any senate candidate in U.S.History - $7,176,535  or $85-per-vote:

Spending PerVote In Senate Races
Vermont Republican Richard Tarrantspent by far the most money on each vote, while fellow self-funders Pete Ricketts, a Nebraska Republican, and Ned Lamont, a Connecticut Democrat, placedsecond and third, respectively.

Sanders spent $34-per-vote.

Of course, unlike Tarrant, Sanders had a message.

I still have no idea what Ritchie Rich's was, do you?

With problems erupting on several fronts from a recent security breach of a state computer data base to continued delays in removing state employees from a contaminated state office building in Bennington, Gov. Jim Douglas got unusually defensive at his weekly press conference at the state capitol on Thursday when asked how he’s dealing with recent crises.

Replied King James:

“Well, that’s the nature of this business. I’ve been in Montpelier, as you know, for a third of a century. It’s very, very challenging. There are obviously people who are not interested in my political success and they’re certainly exercising every opportunity to try to act on that belief this year.”   

HOWEVER, as he gets out and around the state, noted Gov. Douglas, the Republican winner by 15 points over Democrat Scudder Parker in November - he finds the people of Vermont “very supportive and appreciative” of the hard work he does.

But in a follow up question, a reporter asked the governor if he really thinks sarcoidosis problems at the Bennington state office building and problems with the computer security breach are actually the work of the Democrats?

Replied Vermont's chief executive:

“Well, I’ll be perfectly honest, some of the questions I get from the media sound an awful lot like some of the emails that come out of the other party headquarters. So, I don’t think it’s a coincidence.”

What?

Asked if he was charging the media with "carrying the water" of the opposition party, Douglas sarcastically replied he would “never make that assertion.”

The testy back and forth with reporters came after Gov. Douglas acknowledged that one of the companies that provided replacement trailers for the Bennington office bldg - trailers that turned out to be contaminated with mold - came from Facteau Residential, a company owned by a Douglas campaign contributor.

UPDATE -

After the presser, yours truly hopped in the car and drove home to Burlap to cut up a radio story for WDEV.

Turns out the Guv calmed down and went into serious damage control mode as reported by Ross Sneyd of the Associated Press.

On the defensive, Governor Blames Dean, Democrats, media

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) _ Buffeted by a week's worth of bad news on several different fronts, Gov. Jim Douglas lashed out Thursday at the Dean administration, legislative Democrats and the media, suggesting they were responsible for some of his challenges.

Within an hour of delivering his defensive appraisal of the week's news, Douglas' staff was ushering reporters back into his office so he could apologize and say he didn't really mean it.

It was a remarkable and unusual display by a politician who seldom loses his cool.

"First of all, let me apologize to you for the comments at the end of the press conference,'' Douglas said to the five reporters who were still in the Statehouse an hour later. It's not characteristic, as I think all of you know. I've worked with all of you for many, many years. I reacted to a question earlier in the press conference that frankly questioned my integrity and something I resent strongly and that I think affected my answers throughout the balance of the press conference today.''

Douglas was especially prickly throughout his weekly meeting with the media. Questioned repeatedly about why it has taken so long to move workers out of a state office building in Bennington where at least six people have come down with a rare disease, he suggested at one point that former Gov. Howard Dean hadn't done anything about it.

'"The first diagnosis was in 1994 and this is the first administration that's dealt with it,'' Douglas said.

His staff later corrected him. The first case of sarcoidosis was diagnosed in 1992, said spokesman Jason Gibbs. Subsequent diagnoses were in 1998, 2000, 2005 and two in 2006. The outbreak was not identified as a cluster worthy of further investigation until last summer, Douglas said.

In his subsequent meeting with reporters, Douglas backed off on blaming the Dean administration. "I'm not blaming my predecessor for any inaction,'' he said. "I simply wanted to point out to all of you that I took action.'

But those poor state workers are still having to go to work everyday in that sick building, Governor.

What's taking you so long?

United States Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont, and other members of the U.S. Senate’s freshman class of 2007, met with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Tuesday.

The junior senator from Vermont (pictured, at left, on Burlington's Church Street in mid-December), put out a press release afterward and also included a follow-up letter he’d sent to Condoleezza. A very, direct and to-the-point letter, if I do say so myself.

I didn’t see or hear any coverage in the Vermont press - anybody catch anything?

(Update: VPR had it.)

“Let me tell you how I read the Constitution of the United States,” wrote Sen. Sanders.

“The wording of Article 1, Section 8 is explicit: ‘The Congress shall have the power . . . to declare war.’ The Congress declares war, not the President. The President certainly plays a central role in foreign policy, but the Congress also has Constitutional authority in this area. That means if the Bush administration provokes a war against Iran, as it is currently threatening to do, we will have a Constitutional crisis of the gravest severity. If the President ignores the Constitutionally-defined and mandated Congressional role in making war, there will be very dire consequences for this administration.”

“Very dire consequences for this administration?”

Has a ring to it, eh?

“Now is the time to increase the level of diplomacy, not the level of American troops put into harm’s way in the middle of a civil war,” writes Ol’ Bernardo.

Also on Tuesday, the Independent from the Green Mountain State “became the first cosponsor of S. Res. 39, a resolution offered by Senator Robert Byrd, which declares the need for the Administration to seek approval before instigating offensive military action against another nation. He is also a cosponsor of S. 233, which prevents the President from escalating the war and increasing the troop numbers in Iraq without the express consent of Congress.”

Reality?

What a concept.

P.S. Health-wise, I’m doing well. Chemotherapy is what’s happening. (Heck, been doing that since Woodstock, eh?)

Cancer cells grow very fast. My little lymphoma tumor, first discovered on New Year's, grew real fast. The chemo drugs are designed to kill fast growing cells in the body. Hair cells grow fast. That's why mine will disappear in a couple weeks. I've been reminded Vermont's entire congressional delegation is bald!

There’s chemical warfare underway inside of me. What a novel approach. I am, after all, a pile of chemicals. The tumor has already shrunk a good bit. The jaundice is gone.

The fact that I’m under 60 and only have it in one place - my abdomen - are positive indicators that statistically increase recovery rates.

Saw my new doctor today. Dr. Eric Pillemer is one of 12 oncologists at the Mary Fanny cancer clinic. It is a very busy place, but there’s a flow to it. Modern fast-food medicine. In and out like an airport - Boettcher Field?

The doc and I are both children of the Sixties. He was even at the 1968 Chicago Democratic Convention, too. Small world, eh?

“End the War in Vietnam, Bring the Troops Home!”

Fast-forward 40 years and you only need to change one word. When will we ever fucking learn?

We shared one little reminiscence about when we were children in the 1950s and 1960s. How anyone of our parents, or their friends, or aunts or uncles getting cancer meant - it’s all over! Kiss of death. Curtains!

It’s not that way anymore. There are survival rates - cure rates.

I haven't been able to respond to everyone's call or email - pacing myself - but you guys have been positively priceless. Consider yourselves hugged! Each and every one of you.

But, still,  it drives the old journalist in me mad to learn they do not know what causes this shit in the first place.

Thank you one and all for your expressions of support, love and good vibes. I may be single and live alone, but right now, it feels like I’ve got one big family out there and I appreciate it very, very much.

I was a resident of Shep 4 up at the Mary Fanny from Thursday until Sunday afternoon. Got the first full chemo-therapy treatment on Saturday. Amazing. Takes 8-9 hours. Four drugs I’ve never heard of are injected into one’s vein. Feels like the fast-growing fist-sized tumor has already shrunk some.

Amazing.

The treatment and care I received was great. The nurses were very special people - hailed from Plattsburgh to Plainfield. I was in very good hands. And one thing they had in common was they loved doing what they do. They were just like the nurses I worked with many moons ago during my Vietnam War conscientious-objector days at Hennepin County General in downtown Minneapolis. Making such a difference in other peoples lives. Being there. (Even if all but the night shift has to park over at the Fanny Allen in Colchester and take a shuttle bus to Hospital Hill in Burlington.)

Yes, indeed, the new “Airport” i.e. Renaissance wing Bill Boettcher & the Boys built, is the butt of many a joke or sarcastic crack. The $60 million underground Renaissance parking garage built into Hospital Hill was coincidentally the target of one letter-to-the-editor in today’s Burlington Free Press:

“...The garage is dimly lit, difficult and dangerous to navigate, and the per-hour rate to park there constitutes highway robbery. The parking garage at the Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center is free.

As a woman I feel unsafe in the parking garage because there is not enough lighting and oftentimes there are few people in the vicinity...”

BUT the good news on Hospital Hill is that about 10 days ago FAHC instituted a new chow policy for patients. These days, a patient picks up the phone and calls the kitchen to place their order when they’re hungry. Lots of choices. Seven flavors of yogurt to choose from. Three different soups. A Honey Mustard Turkey Burger and a Garden Burger everyday. Great mashed potatoes with gravy. A Chef’s Salad, a Caesar Salad or a Mediterranean Salad. Three entrees for dinner to choose from every night plus all kinds of sinful goodies for desert. And it tasted good, too! I had an appetite because They were loading me with steroids and that stimulates the appetite. (Only criticism: the turkey sandwich was particularly skimpy turkey-wise.) The folks who deliver it all to bedside say the new menu ordering has saved dramatically on waste.

Bravo!

Can Internet access for patients be far off?

Monday morning it was out to Fanny Allen for a PET Scan. Nuclear medicine. You’re injected with a radioactive sugar, sit quietly in a recliner for 45 minutes - can’t even read or write - then lay down and get slid into the big machine for pictures. I laid still with my arms over my head for 28 minutes.

It’s supposed to detect cancer anywhere in one's body.

Amazing.

The PET Scanning takes place in the back of a semi-trailer truck that travels around New England. (That's Gayla with the machine at left.) It’s at the Fanny Allen for just two days at a time. Word is Dartmouth’s about to get one of their very own.

So, I’m feeling different but OK. Doc said all those years of John Power Irish Whiskey might reduce side effects from the chemo drugs like nausea. So far so good.

I'd say a new learning period has just begun in this dude's life. And the good vibes, support and love you guys have expressed and shared has lifted the spirits of this Irishman big time.

"And miles to go before I sleep."

That's my theme song now.

Lots more writing ahead.

Let's keep in touch, eh?

Kenneth Thorpe is chair of the Department of Health Policy and Management at Emory University in Atlanta and a former deputy assistant secretary of health policy in the Clinton Administration. Last year he was the Vermont Legislature’s consultant on healthcare reform - the legislature that finally produced and passed the Catamount Healthcare Reform Bill that’s scheduled to go into effect this coming October. You remember?

The “reform” bill that AARP Magazine gave Republican Gov. Jim Douglas an award for signing?

Recently released figures indicate Catamount may not cover as many uninsured Vermonters as it originally promised to, giving critics, including promoters of a single-payer system along the lines of what exists in Canada, France Great Britain and other European countries, fuel for their fire. 

On Wednesday, I bumped into Ol’ Ken outside the office of House Speaker Gaye Symington. We grabbed a couple chairs and sat down for a little one-on-one.

Q. What’s your snapshot of where we are in Vermont on this?

Thorpe: I think where we are is Vermont passed the most far-reaching, important healthcare reform package in the country. The reason it’s different is that most of the reforms were aimed at making health insurance more affordable for the 90 percent of Vermonters who have health insurance.  That is a major part of the Vermont healthcare reform that other states - Massachusetts, the California proposals really don’t address the affordability of healthcare. And that’s one thing that really distinguishes Vermont’s healthcare reform effort.

Q. For example?

Thorpe: For example - two major ways we’re going to reduce the cost of  private health insurance. One is by more effectively managing people that have chronic illness. Most of the healthcare spending in the Vermont system is for patients that have chronic disease - 75 percent of it. We want to more effectively manage it and provide better quality care. That’s going to reduce costs.

The second way we’re going to reduce costs is “pull” a cost-shift out of private health insurance by reducing the uninsured, by increasing, over time, Medicaid rates we can reduce the cost of private health insurance. And both  of those are going to be important for Vermont businesses and families.

Q. To the consumer out there who may not be as sophisticated, the argument defined by our political left Progressive Party is: let’s get real here - there’ll be no real reform until we go to a single-payer like the rest of Western Civilization. What do you say to them?

Thorpe: Well, I think the reforms are much broader-sweeping than even a single-payer. We’re going to the heart of the affordability problem. We’re going to manage chronic illness. It’s not an insurance issue. This is a management issue of people that have chronic diseases.

Ironically, the Canadians, the Europeans are facing the same problems we’re facing. In fact, I’m going to a conference next week in Europe to work with the Canadians, a single-payer country, to build the same type of integrated delivery structures that are embedded in Catamount Health.  They are facing the same problems and pressures in their system that we’re facing in ours.

Q. So the insurance industry - their cut - that’s not a problem in the cost and availability of healthcare in this country?

Thorpe: I think the cost of administering healthcare is too high.  Catamount Health includes several provisions that will reduce administrative costs: going to a single claims form; reducing reporting requirements on physicians. We’re going to really make sure that we do everything we can to simplify the physicians lives and pay them adequately to manage chronic illness.

A lot of what we’re going to be doing this session is putting in new approaches, new ways of paying  physicians, and really making this promise a reality.

Q. You’re hopeful?

Thorpe: I’m very hopeful. The devil’s in the details. We did a lot of hard bipartisan work to pass this last year. Now we have a lot of work to make sure that it’s actually implemented in a very effective way and that will be a challenge.

Thorpe said they will do everything they can to simplify physicians lives and reduce administrative costs. Thorpe will be in Montpelier for two days this week, Wednesday and Thursday, meeting with the leadership of both chambers as well as the members of the health care committees in House and Senate.

P.S. Unfortunately Ol’ Ken’s a little late. On Wednesday, I got a phone call from my Primary Care Physician at UHC. Been with him since 1995 when he brought me back from double pneumonia at the Mary Fanny. The Good Doctor informed me he’s leaving the medical profession next week. He’s only 43.

Great.

Three Thumbs Down!

"Bush Insists US Must Not Fail in Iraq" was the headline in The New York Times this morning - the morning after President George W. Bush's State of the Union address to Congress.

"Bush Urges Congress to Give Iraq Plan a Chance" was the headline in The Washington Post.

Most people I've spoken to said they couldn't stomach watching it.

How did this guy become president?

Here's a taste of the official Vermont reaction:

Sen. Patrick Leahy:

"It is regrettable that the President hasrejected opportunities for a change of course in Iraq.  He has dismissedbipartisan suggestions advanced by the Iraq Study Group, by our commanders whohave been on the ground in Iraq, and by the people’s electedrepresentatives in Congress.  Escalating the conflict will put more of ourtroops in danger and will worsen the war’s toll on efforts to addressurgent needs in our country.  In my view, the Congress should use itsconstitutional authority to try to change course in Iraq by opposing anescalation of troops and changing our budget priorities so we can bring ourtroops home."

Sen. Bernie Sanders:

"Tonight we heard furtherevidence that this President is out of touch with the reality and needs of theAmerican people.  At a time when our citizens want to wind-down the war in Iraqand bring our troops home as soon as possible, the President has proposedescalating it. Instead of leading us towards universal health care, he wants totax workers’ health care benefits and cut funding for hospitals servingthe lowest-income Americans.  Instead of offering the meaningful policiesneeded to combat global warming and position our nation as a leader in cleanenergy he continues to offer only empty rhetoric.  The American peoplecannot afford these backwards policies. It’s time for bold action thatwill end the quagmire in Iraq, ensure that every Americans receives health careas a right of citizenship, and protect our environment for future generations.”

Rep. Peter Welch:
"There is no more immediate need than achange of course in Iraq.  Regrettably, the President stubbornly clings toa dangerous and misguided policy of escalation, disregarding the advice ofhis military advisors, the will of the American people, the sound adviceof the Iraq Study Committee, and a growing bipartisan consensus in Congress.

"And while repeatedly making pledges toexpand health care coverage and contain costs, the number of uninsured Americans steadilyclimbs year after year.  After declaring our nation is 'addicted to oil'a year ago, he held steadfastly to a dead-end 'drill our way out' energy policythat short-changed alternative energy."

Sounds like they're on the same page, eh?

Ol' Bernardo got his first senatorial splash in the Sunday New York Times. A magazine piece by Times reporter Mark Liebovitch (formerly with The Washington Post.)

Kind of disappointing actually. As one reader put it, "I think the author was a little too much in love with the sound of his own writing."

Here's a taste:

Sanders crinkles his face whenever a conversation veers too long from this kind of “important stuff” and into the “silly stuff,” like clothes and style. “I do not like personality profiles,” Sanders told me during our first conversation. He trumpets a familiar rant against the media, its emphasis on gaffes, polls and trivial details.

“If I walked up on a stage and fell down, that would be the top story,” Sanders says. “You wouldn’t hear anything about the growing gap between rich and poor.”

When I first met Sanders in person on Church Street, there were big streaks of dried mud on his shoes and dried blood on his neck from what looked to be a shaving mishap. His hair flew every which way in a gust of wind. At six feet tall, he is wiry, but he walks with shoulders hunched and elbows out, like a big, skulking bird. From a distance, he looked as if he could be homeless.

Give me a break!

Here you have Vermont Sen. Bernard Sanders criticizing the media for its shallowness and superficiality and what does Liebovitch write but a rather shallow, snarky and superficial piece?

Go figure.

Of course, this is the same New York Times that allowed President Bush to lie his way into the disaster in Iraq unchecked.

P.S. Little reality check in today's Washington Post:

Confidence in Bush Leadership at All-Time Low, Poll Finds
By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen

President Bush will deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday at the weakest point of his presidency, facing deep public dissatisfaction over his Iraq war policies and eroding confidence in his leadership, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

With a major confrontation between Congress and the president brewing over Iraq, Americans overwhelmingly oppose Bush's plan to send an additional 21,500 troops to the conflict. By wide margins, they prefer that congressional Democrats, who now hold majorities in both chambers, rather than the president, take the lead in setting the direction for the country.

Iraq dominates the national agenda, with 48 percent of Americans calling the war the single most important issue they want Bush and the Congress to deal with this year. No other issue rises out of single digits. The poll also found that the public trusts congressional Democrats over Bush to deal with the conflict by a margin of 60 percent to 33 percent.

Here's the rest of it.

Nice little drive to Montpeculiar this morning. Only eight cars off the Interstate.  Patience was the key - 50 mph in the right lane.

Went down for the peace march and rally in front of the Vermont State House.  The AP’s Willie Ring put the crowd at “about 200.”

Sorry, Willie, our count had it at “about 350.”

And it was absolutely frigid, with a piercing wind blowing across the snow-covered Statehouse lawn.

There were a number of folks who looked old enough to have, like me, attended some of the antiwar marches of the 1960s. Instead of Iraq, our troops were dying and getting maimed in Vietnam. In both cases the White House lied to Congress and to the American people about the justification for their bloody sacrifice.

When will we ever learn?

Joanne Boyle (on the left) made a slippery two-and-a-half-hour drive from Perkinsville to Montpelier. She also made the “ NO MEANS NO” banner. She's the mother of an 18-year-old son. And, she told us, it was her very first protest march!

Always nice to see new blood, eh?

“NO MEANS NO," she told us, is what a mother tells her child. Every kid hears it. And President George W. Bush, heard it, she said, on November 7 when the American people voted the Democrats back into power in both House and Senate after a 12 year absence. Unfortunately, he’s behaving like a very bad little boy. (Claudia Marieb of Montpelier and Pam DeAndrea of Calais are helping her hold up her banner.)

Joanne also shared with us that she was particularly struck the other day when listening to an NPR piece on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., honored with a national holiday last Monday. She never realized before that he was only 39 when he was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

She’s 49, she told us. Time to get going!  Ms. Boyle will also be joining other Vermonters going down to Washington next weekend for the big national antiwar march.

Will the president hear them?