Posted
ByPaul Heintz
on Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:25 PM
File: Matthew Thorsen
Attorney General Bill Sorrell
Updated at 4:33 p.m.
After meeting with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents Friday to discuss allegations against Attorney General Bill Sorrell, the Vermont State Police announced that “no state-based investigation will be commenced.”
Left unsaid was whether federal officials would launch their own review. Paul Holstein, chief counsel for the Albany division of the FBI, which has jurisdiction over Vermont, declined to comment.
Last week, a panel of 11 state’s attorneys released the results of a nearly nine-month investigation into a series of allegations made by Vermont Republican Party vice chair Brady Toensing and based on reporting by Seven Days and the New York Times. The panel dismissed several of Toensing’s six allegations but referred the most serious to the state police.
That allegation centers around a Washington, D.C., dinner Sorrell attended in December 2013, during which representatives of a Texas law firm gave him an envelope stuffed with $10,000 worth of campaign donations. At the same dinner, according to a sworn affidavit signed by Sorrell, the firm asked him to file suit against the oil and gas industry. Sorrell later did so and hired the Texas firm, Baron & Budd, to represent the state.
Throughout his campaign for the presidency, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has proudly stated that he has never before run a negative television advertisement — and that he hoped he never would.
These days, Sanders is getting pretty close to the line.
On Thursday, four days before the Iowa caucuses, the senator released a new ad ostensibly criticizing the investment bank Goldman Sachs for its role in the 2008 financial crisis. But the real target of the ad is clear: Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, who has accepted $2.2 million in speaking fees from Goldman over the past decade.
"How does Wall Street get away with it? Millions in campaign contributions and speaking fees," a narrator intones. "Our economy works for Wall Street because it’s rigged by Wall Street. And that’s the problem. As long as Washington is bought and paid for, we can’t build an economy that works for people."
An email obtained during an investigation of Attorney General Bill Sorrell suggests he sought to punish a donor to a rival’s campaign during the course of official business.
First disclosed in this week’s Fair Game political column, the email pertains to a September 2014 press conference organized by then-lieutenant gubernatorial candidate Dean Corren and attended by Sorrell. Standing in front of McCaffrey's Sunoco in Burlington, the two called for legislation requiring gasoline distributors to disclose pricing information to the attorney general’s office.
After the event, the head of a local business group raised concerns about Sorrell’s participation, prompting the AG to reply, “I care about the issue, not to mention the $4k a whole seller gave a prior opponent …”
The “whole seller” in question appears to be Skip Vallee, a political lightning rod whose Colchester-based business, R.L. Vallee, Inc., has been accused of driving up gas prices in Chittenden County. Now the Vermont chairman of Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-Fla.) presidential campaign, Vallee has contributed generously to Republican candidates over the years, including President George W. Bush, who in 2005 appointed him ambassador to Slovakia.
Rep. Dave Sharpe (D-Bristol) speaks Wednesday on the House floor.
After weeks of delicate deliberation, the Vermont House on Wednesday approved a long-promised "fix" to controversial school spending thresholds set to take effect next fiscal year. By a vote of 94 to 52, the House opted to give school districts more breathing room in their budgets — and to reduce the penalties they would face if they overspend.
Problem is, the Senate chose an entirely different path last week — to repeal the thresholds altogether — and its leaders aren't budging.
"We're standing strong," Senate Education Committee Chair Ann Cummings (D-Washington) said Wednesday.
Though he characterized himself as "eternally optimistic" that the two bodies could reach accord, House Speaker Shap Smith (D-Morristown) conceded late Wednesday that he had no idea how they would.
"If I knew the path forward right now, we would be on it," he said. "But I think it's going to take a fair amount of work — the next couple days and maybe a week."
Time is not on their side. The uncertainty has left local school boards wondering how much money they can spend, even as they race to complete their budgets ahead of Town Meeting Day.
Garrett Graff (right, center) speaking to the Senate Government Operations Committee
Ex-journalist Garrett Graff said Wednesday that he’s not ready to announce whether he’s running for lieutenant governor, but he tried to make the case to a legislative committee that people in his position should be allowed to run.
The Montpelier native spent more than 11 years in Washington, D.C., before moving to Burlington last fall. He argued Wednesday that he meets the constitutional residency requirement for a lieutenant gubernatorial candidate: One must have lived in the state for four years prior to the election.
“Residency is always a mix of physical presence and intent to return,” Graff told the Senate Government Operations Committee. “Physical presence alone is a poor measurement of where someone might consider home.”
A better measure, Graff argued, is one based on where a person is registered to vote or drive a car, something a person can legally do in only one state at a time.
Posted
ByPaul Heintz
on Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 7:44 PM
File: Matthew Thorsen
Attorney General Bill Sorrell
Vermont State Police officials plan to meet with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents Friday to determine whether to initiate a criminal investigation into allegations against Attorney General Bill Sorrell, according to a VSP spokesman.
The spokesman, Scott Waterman, confirmed that his agency had "received a complaint of alleged criminal misconduct" from a panel of state's attorneys charged with investigating six allegations against Sorrell. He said Friday's meeting had been scheduled "to determine if an investigation is warranted and who has jurisdiction to perform the investigation if one occurs."
As Seven Days reported in this week's Fair Game political column, Waterman told the newspaper Tuesday that his agency had already launched such an investigation. On Wednesday, he told Seven Days that he had been mistaken and that the state police had not yet done so. He attributed the error to internal miscommunication at the VSP.
"We are not investigating at this time," Waterman said Wednesday. "We are going to be consulting with the FBI over the next couple of days because there's a question of jurisdiction."
Rep. Chris Pearson (P-Burlington) and other lawmakers offering a property tax relief measure
Thirty-five Democratic and Progressive lawmakers have proposed that Vermont's residential property owners pay education taxes based on their incomes — expanding a system in place for many state residents.
Rep. Chris Pearson (P-Burlington) said the bill would increase the fairness of the school tax by asking higher-income Vermonters to pay the same share of their pay as middle-income property owners. Vermonters with $100,000 in household income now pay about 3 percent of their wages in property taxes, compared to 0.5 percent for households with income of $1 million, he said.
“We believe we have a way to make our school funding more equitable and, at the same time, give most Vermonters a break on their property taxes,” said Sen. Anthony Pollina (D/P-Washington), sponsor of the Senate version of the bill.
Currently, the income-based system covers only taxpayers with household incomes of $90,000 or less and only for a house and two acres. Residential property owners with more than two acres pay an additional amount based on the property’s value.
Posted
ByPaul Heintz
on Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:02 PM
Five days before the Iowa caucuses, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) plans to leave the campaign trail Wednesday to huddle with President Barack Obama at the White House.
"The President and Sen. Sanders first discussed this meeting last December when Sen. Sanders attended the Congressional Holiday Ball," White House press secretary John Earnest said in a statement Tuesday afternoon. "The two will meet privately in the Oval Office, and there will be no formal agenda."
The confab comes just days after Obama threw shade at the Vermonter in an interview with Politico, dismissing him as nothing more than a "bright, shiny object" in the campaign to succeed him. The president spoke more favorably about his former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, who is battling Sanders for the Democratic nomination.
Though Obama campaigned for Sanders in Vermont in 2006 and Sanders returned the favor in 2008 and 2012, the two have never been close. The Washington Post reported Tuesday that in Sanders' 40 visits to the White House since Obama was elected president, visitor logs showed them meeting privately in the Oval Office just once, in December 2014.
Posted
ByPaul Heintz
on Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:23 PM
In his first in-depth interview about the race to succeed him, President Barack Obama on Friday dismissed the notion that Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) insurgent campaign mirrored his own successful 2008 bid.
"No, I don't think — I don't think that's true," Obama said. "I think Bernie came in with the luxury of being a complete long-shot and just letting loose. I think Hillary [Clinton] came in with the — both privilege and burden of being perceived as the frontrunner. And, as a consequence, you know, where they stood at the beginning probably helps to explain why the language sometimes is different."
During the 40-minute interview with Politico's Glenn Thrush, released Monday morning, Obama occasionally complimented Sanders.
"There's no doubt that Bernie has tapped into a running thread in Democratic politics that says: Why are we still constrained by the terms of the debate that were set by Ronald Reagan 30 years ago?" Obama said. "You know, why is it that we should be scared to challenge conventional wisdom and talk bluntly about inequality and, you know, be full-throated in our progressivism? And, you know, that has an appeal and I understand that."
But, at times, the president sounded a more dismissive tone.
"You know, you're always looking at the bright, shiny object that people don't, haven't seen before," he said, apparently referring to the senator from Vermont. "That's a disadvantage to [Clinton]. Bernie is somebody who —although I don't know as well because he wasn't, obviously, in my administration, has the virtue of saying exactly what he believes, and [with] great authenticity, great passion, and is fearless. His attitude is, 'I got nothing to lose.'"
Robin Lunge, the governor's health reform director, Gov. Peter Shumlin and Al Gobeille, chair of the Green Mountain Care Board
The administration of Gov. Peter Shumlin and the quasi-independent Green Mountain Care Board laid out the framework Monday of their joint negotiations with the federal government for a waiver that would allow the state to promote a new and fundamentally different payment system for health care.
The state needs federal permission because two of the health insurance systems it wants to involve are federal programs — Medicare and Medicaid, which respectively cover the elderly and the poor. The state wants change to include commercial insurance, too.
The state is proposing to move from the current health care model that pays a fee for a service such as a blood test or a physical exam. In the new system, hospitals and doctors would receive set payments for their patient populations and have flexibility to provide appropriate medical care to prevent or manage patient health. The precise payment methodology has yet to be determined.
Monday’s briefing, featuring Gov. Peter Shumlin and Al Gobeille, chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, coincided with the state’s submission of preliminary terms and conditions for the waiver from federal regulations that Vermont seeks.